Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_14.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:21:45
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.3843 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.3601 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.6647 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.5998 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.5822 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.5525 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   4.8712 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   2.8231 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.1092 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.7579 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.5884 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.4660 minutes

ans =

    12

CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.51, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.29, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.72, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.94, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.71, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.71, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CCGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.33, deficit  2.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.87, deficit  2.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.61, deficit  0.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -8.00, deficit  4.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.06, deficit  1.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.13, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.87, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GACUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.26, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUCCU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.34, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
UGAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGCUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.94, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UGUCA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UUGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -5.81, deficit  2.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
UGGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -6.91, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCCAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -4.11, deficit  0.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
AAUCU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.57, deficit  1.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.37, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.14, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CUCGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
AUUAU 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -4.04, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.09, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
UUUUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -4.40, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GUAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.09, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
AAAAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.96, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.36, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GGUUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.51, deficit -0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
AGAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
AGGAU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.36, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.19, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAUGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -4.90, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CGGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CCACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -8.58, deficit  5.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUAU 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -4.04, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.09, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
GGCCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UAUCA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.56, deficit  1.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGACA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.16, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UUCGA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.13, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGUCU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.20, deficit  0.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.78, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UUCGA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.13, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GAAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.51, deficit  1.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GGUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.10, deficit  0.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
AGAAAU 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.28, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
GUUCGC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_34974.1,  6 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -3.90, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.34, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55                 
UUUUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.32, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGCUUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -4.87, deficit -0.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GACUCC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_30541.1,  5 NTs,                CAUUCG,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F                             
CUUCAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -5.81, deficit  2.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
UUCCUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -9.14, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AAAAGU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -6.99, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CUUCAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -5.81, deficit  2.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
CUAAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.27, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
UGAUUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.11, deficit  2.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGUACG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.02, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUCCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_46463.1,  4 NTs,                UUUCGA,score      -5.15, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CACCUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_41285.1,  5 NTs,                GAACUC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35                               
CAGAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.70, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGAUUC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.03, deficit  0.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CUCUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.92, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CUUUUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -3.94, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AAGAUU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.13, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
GUCUAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.32, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GAGAGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -8.17, deficit  3.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGGCCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -7.59, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UCCAAA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.90, deficit  0.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUAGUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.23, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GGAACC 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.85, deficit  6.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCCUUG 1  Matches 15; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score     -14.13, deficit 12.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  -0.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGUAAA 1  Matches 37; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.79, deficit  1.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.69, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UAGGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18785.1,  5 NTs,                UAAGGG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35                             
AUAUCU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.57, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAAUG 1  Matches 35; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.56, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGCUGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.13, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
CAUUGG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -4.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CCAAUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.49, deficit  0.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UGACUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -8.51, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CGGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.16, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.28, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
UUUAUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -6.55, deficit  2.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGAAG 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.81, deficit  6.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.26, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAAGAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.08, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUAUGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -4.51, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
AGUGAU 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.77, deficit  0.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.01, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GCAUAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.99, deficit  1.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GUAUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -3.41, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GGUAUC 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CAACCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -8.38, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
CUCGAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.08, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.09, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUAGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.29, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UGGCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -8.51, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CAAAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.77, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
AUCUGCU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -7.25, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CGAUGAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -6.74, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAUGUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -7.97, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGGAAGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -7.36, deficit  2.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
UGGCGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -9.08, deficit  5.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
AUACAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -8.99, deficit  5.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GUGGAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.03, deficit  1.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GACAAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -7.15, deficit  1.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UGAAGUA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.88, deficit  0.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GAUUUAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -6.69, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GAGAAAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.67, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGGAUAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.97, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
CUCACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.26, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CUUCGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -5.83, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.06, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CGGACCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.68, deficit  2.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAGGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -8.92, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AGACAAU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.48, deficit  0.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
ACAAAUU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.20, deficit  1.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGGUGUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -8.68, deficit  3.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGAAACG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CCGAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -6.99, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GGUAAAC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.11, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CUUUAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.69, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GAAAUGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -5.60, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
UGUGAAA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.13, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CUUAAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.10, deficit  2.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAUAUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.73, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GAGGAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.58, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
UGGGCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -9.53, deficit  6.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CUAAACG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
UUUGAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.27, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
CUCUUCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.69, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
CUUAAUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -7.46, deficit  2.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.17, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
AGAGCGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.97, deficit  0.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
UGUUGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -7.77, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GAAUUAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.97, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGGAACG 1  Matches 15; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.81, deficit  7.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUCUAGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -6.79, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GUGCAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.71, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GCACUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -8.07, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CAAUAUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.19, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CAAAGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.19, deficit  1.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GUGCUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -6.68, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUUUCAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -6.52, deficit  1.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UUCACCA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.01, deficit  0.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGCUGGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.37, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UAGGGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -9.39, deficit  4.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCAGUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.91, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.92, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUAACUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -4.57, deficit  0.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
ACUAAAUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_23219.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -6.59, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55 
AUAAAGUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.53, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CGAAGAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.10, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UGGAUCAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.86, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GGCACUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -15.25, deficit  7.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GAGAGGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -12.32, deficit  5.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
UGGAUAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -9.77, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
CCGAAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -8.55, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
GAGGAGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -11.57, deficit  6.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
GAGAACAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.78, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
AUGUUGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.28, deficit  2.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UCCACAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -12.06, deficit  4.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CGGUUAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -8.05, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
GGAACAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -2.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
GGCUAUAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.55, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
UGCUAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -11.48, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CAACUGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -12.19, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CAGAGAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.18, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CUGCCAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -8.78, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUCCCUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.89, deficit  4.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAUGGCGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score     -10.34, deficit  4.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAGAAUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -8.64, deficit  3.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
GGAGCCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score     -10.84, deficit  7.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CAGUAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -9.47, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
AGAAAUGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.45, deficit  0.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GCAACCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.00, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGAACAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -9.12, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAAUGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -6.96, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CGCCAUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -8.94, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
UAUAUCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.56, deficit  2.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GGGGAAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -6.53, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
CGUAAUCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -6.22, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAGCUGUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -11.30, deficit  3.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
CGUGUUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.62, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CUCGCAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -12.08, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAUAAUAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -6.10, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGUCGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -6.48, deficit  2.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCAGUAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -12.13, deficit  5.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
ACAGAAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -11.05, deficit  5.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CUCCCUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -8.73, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AAUAAUCU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_38646.2,  7 NTs,              GGUAAUGC,score      -6.23, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GCUCUUGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.10, deficit  2.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CUCUGGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score     -11.61, deficit  5.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUUCAAAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -6.00, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
CAGCGCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -11.36, deficit  3.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
CCGAUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -10.76, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAAACUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -11.10, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GGGCGUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGUGAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -8.12, deficit  3.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
UGUUCCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -9.52, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
UUAAGGAGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -14.72, deficit  8.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGUUAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score     -10.24, deficit  3.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
ACGCGAGAU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -6.97, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
CUGAGCAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score     -11.21, deficit  4.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CAUUAGAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -9.87, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
GGGUCAAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -8.34, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
GGUCCACUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -6.98, deficit  3.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUGGCCUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -8.68, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUGCAGCUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -10.49, deficit  5.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
UUCCCGUAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -11.14, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.92, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
CUUCGUUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86378.1,  7 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -8.52, deficit  2.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH                         
CAAUUAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -10.10, deficit  3.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
CACAUCAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -9.32, deficit  2.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GACGGGUUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score      -9.62, deficit  2.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
AUAGUUAGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50537.2,  8 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -10.32, deficit  6.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35                 
CGAUAAUAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -9.65, deficit  1.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUAACAAUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -9.61, deficit  5.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
CGACUCCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.14, deficit  5.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAACUCCUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.90, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
UGACUUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.06, deficit  5.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCGGAGAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score     -10.73, deficit  4.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
CGUUGAUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.52, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GGGCAGGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -11.38, deficit  4.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CAUGAACUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -9.36, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
GCCUAGGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -9.75, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CGGGGGAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.71, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CAAAUCCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
ACGCGCUAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -11.34, deficit  4.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
GGUUCAAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -7.18, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
CUCCAAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -10.08, deficit  2.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CCCGAUUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -12.18, deficit  3.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GCAACUGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.75, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUAUGACUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -9.76, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CUUCGGAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -8.30, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGCCUAAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -7.89, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GGGCCCAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -10.28, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CUCUGUCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -8.72, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUGAAAGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -8.60, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
GCUCGUCAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score      -9.32, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
UUGCGAAGA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.82, deficit  1.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGGAAUGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -12.36, deficit  4.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUACUAGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -10.69, deficit  5.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAUUACGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score      -8.78, deficit  3.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CGAGUAAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.81, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GGUAGGAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -9.75, deficit  3.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUAGGAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -8.69, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
CAAGAUAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -8.64, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AAUCGGAAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -11.45, deficit  4.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
GAAAAAGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.53, deficit  3.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GUGACUUGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -13.84, deficit  8.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GUUGCUGUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -17.74, deficit 10.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUGAAAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.39, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GUAUGCCUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -11.05, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CGGGACUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.57, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GGAACAAGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.31, deficit  7.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUCAAUAUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -10.63, deficit  4.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
AGAGCGAUAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -13.01, deficit  4.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
CGAUGUGUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score      -9.97, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
GUGAAAACAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.16, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGCACGGUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.80, deficit  6.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CGAAAUCUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -10.82, deficit  6.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
CGAACGUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -16.37, deficit  8.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CUUCUUUACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -13.72, deficit  6.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
CUACGGCAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.63, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GAUAUGUAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -10.76, deficit  4.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.78, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGCUAAUGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.71, deficit  0.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAACAAAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -8.55, deficit  0.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
UGCGAAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.60, deficit  5.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CGCUGGAGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -11.96, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-F                               
GCUGAUCAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score     -10.87, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
UUCUUACAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score     -14.73, deficit  9.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
UAGCUGACUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -11.58, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
CUUAAGCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -10.87, deficit  5.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGGUGGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -9.26, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCGGACUAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score     -14.21, deficit  8.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
GUAAAGAAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.93, deficit  5.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGAAAGAACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -13.15, deficit  6.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAAACAGAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -12.00, deficit  5.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAGGGAGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.35, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
UUCUUCGUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -10.59, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
GCUUUAAAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -11.51, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
UACUCGGGCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.18, deficit  1.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
CUCAUACUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -13.15, deficit  5.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUCUGAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -12.01, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAGGACGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -12.97, deficit  7.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAACAAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -8.71, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGAGAAAUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.59, deficit  5.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGGUUUAAUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -10.49, deficit  4.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
CAUUGGUGGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -10.99, deficit  3.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CAAUAAGAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.13, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GGAUAGGGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.64, deficit  3.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CCUGACGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score      -9.94, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGUUUUUUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.31, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AGCAAAGGAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.65, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
AUUCGAUCUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -8.89, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
CUCAAGAGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -10.20, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GACAAAUAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -14.05, deficit  4.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUAUUAAAGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -12.76, deficit  5.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUAAAUCAUUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -13.25, deficit  6.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.90, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUUACAUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -15.40, deficit 10.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
CCGAACAGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -14.89, deficit  8.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
GUUACAUCGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -12.20, deficit  6.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GAGCAGAAGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -12.56, deficit  4.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUCACAUGUUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -12.18, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CUCCGAAACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -12.37, deficit  5.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.79, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAGAUAUCUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -14.63, deficit  7.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
CGAAAUCCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -18.23, deficit 10.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAAAAGCAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.24, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CGAUGGACAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -10.76, deficit  5.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
CUGUGUCGGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -16.20, deficit  9.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GUUUUGUAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -10.72, deficit  3.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
CGAUAUGCAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.60, deficit  6.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UCACAACCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -14.85, deficit  7.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
GAAGCGGUCGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -11.40, deficit  1.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
GCGUAGUUAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.96, deficit  4.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGUUAAAAUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score      -7.58, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUUAACUCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_35978.6, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -12.37, deficit  9.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CUUGAGCUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.82, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GGAAAUGAGAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -16.28, deficit 10.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAAAAACAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.14, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CAAAAAGGUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.06, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
UUUAAUUGUUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score      -9.58, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
AGUAGGAGCUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -11.94, deficit  6.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
CCUGGGUUGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -10.71, deficit  1.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.02, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
GACGAAAAGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score      -9.35, deficit  2.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAAUUAUGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score      -8.46, deficit  3.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
CCAUAAUGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.06, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
AAAGAAAAAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -12.49, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GUAUUUUUGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score      -8.67, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GAAACCUUUAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -12.03, deficit  3.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
UUAGAUCUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -10.34, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAACAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -14.23, deficit  6.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGUCGACAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -10.87, deficit  5.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
CAUGAGUUUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -12.26, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
GUUCGAAAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -10.88, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
UGGCACUUGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -15.26, deficit  7.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CUAAAAUUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -11.48, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.93, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CCCAAGAUAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -13.16, deficit  7.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CGGGGGAAGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.35, deficit  8.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.32, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
UUGGUAAAGAUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.03, deficit  6.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.56, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCCGACUAAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -13.01, deficit  6.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.93, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CGACCUCAUAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.98, deficit  7.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.55, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAGCCGGAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -14.59, deficit  6.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
CUUGGGAGGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -15.25, deficit  9.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUUCAUCGAUAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70505.1, 11 NTs,          GAUCAGCCAUGC,score     -12.16, deficit  5.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.33, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35
AAUAAGAAAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.83, deficit  4.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CGAAAACUAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -11.81, deficit  3.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUAGGUCGCGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -15.15, deficit  6.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
CGGCUGUGGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -15.15, deficit  8.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
UGGGAGUCGGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -12.78, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.21, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGCCUAGUACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19239.1,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -15.51, deficit  6.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F                     
GAUGGGUAAGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -13.40, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
GUCAUAAAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.85, deficit  7.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GAUUAAGAUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.94, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUUAACAGCGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -14.92, deficit 10.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUUCCCAUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -17.77, deficit  7.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGUGAGUUUGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -14.73, deficit  5.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
GUCUAAUUGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -15.32, deficit  6.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
GCCAAUGAGUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -10.93, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CUCAUGUUGGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -12.12, deficit  5.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GUUUCCAGAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -13.25, deficit  5.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
CGAAAAGAUGUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.91, deficit  6.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUAGGCGAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -15.73, deficit  6.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.05, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CGGUUGGACCCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.99, deficit  4.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.15, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAUGAGAAAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -12.66, deficit  5.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.63, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UCAUAAAGAAGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38011.1, 13 NTs,        GCUUAGAAGCAGCC,score     -17.27, deficit  9.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.34, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUAUGGUGGAAGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -10.55, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
UGAAAAGUACAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.76, deficit  9.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAAUGUGGAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -10.09, deficit  1.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.15, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
UAUGAGAGCCCAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -21.41, deficit 13.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CGAAAAGGAAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -10.67, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUCACCCAUUUAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -14.75, deficit  3.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.31, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
GCCCAGCAAUGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -14.73, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.23, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
AGUAGGUGCAAAUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -16.63, deficit  7.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
UUCCGCUCGAAGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -15.98, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.18, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
CGAAUCGGUAGCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -22.54, deficit 14.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
AUCGCAGAGACAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -18.40, deficit  8.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.05, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
AGGGAUUUAGACACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42211.1, 13 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -14.75, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.59, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35     
CAGAUGAGUUGAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93650.1, 15 NTs,       CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG,score     -13.72, deficit  6.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.81, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
CGUAGGGUGAUAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30585.1, 16 NTs,     AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU,score     -16.26, deficit  3.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.20, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 81.2857	 69.0000	4
5	100.0000	 90.5714	 48.0000	23
6	100.0000	 86.2857	 46.4286	60
7	 99.8571	 49.8571	 14.0000	51
8	 99.2857	 27.0000	  3.4286	46
9	 99.2857	 19.7143	  1.7143	68
10	 94.5714	  9.0000	  0.2857	41
11	 84.4286	  4.4286	  0.0000	42
12	 46.0000	  0.8571	  0.0000	23
13	 17.5714	  0.2857	  0.0000	12
14	  7.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  2.1429	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.4286	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.5714	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.2857	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.1429	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  58 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence 130 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence 131 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 179 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 208 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 211 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 232 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 239 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 241 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 244 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 248 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 252 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 257 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 258 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 260 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 275 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 292 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 300 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 302 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 309 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 310 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 311 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 311 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 312 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 316 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 319 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 334 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 344 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 362 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 384 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 389 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 410 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 422 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 427 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 429 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 430 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 432 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 436 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 444 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 450 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 455 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 488 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 494 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 507 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 509 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 517 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 537 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 603 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 613 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 624 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 647 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 651 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 723 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 737 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 758 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 763 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 780 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 813 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 840 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 875 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 881 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 991 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 1049 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 1144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1321 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.5238%
Number of models giving false positives is 300 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     7.62
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.39
